Legal Opinion

E.T. Plastering, Inc. v. Pacheco

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 14, 2001No. 3D00-778Published

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal by E.T. Plastering, Inc., a defendant below, from an order denying its claim for attorney’s fees and costs under section 768.79, Florida Statutes (1999) based upon the plaintiffs refusal of an offer of settlement. The appellee Pacheco has candidly confessed error conditioned only upon our affirmance of the summary judgment entered in E.T.’s favor below. See Earnest & Stewart, Inc. v. Godina, 732 So.2d 364, 367 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Pennsylvania Lumbermens Mut. Ins. Co. v. Sunrise Club, Inc., 711 So.2d 593 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). Since we have done just that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Earnest & Stewart, Inc. v. CodinaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. Pacheco v. Florida Power & Light Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  3. PENNSYLVANIA LUMBERMENS v. Sunrise ClubDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API