Legal Opinion

New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Village of New Rochelle

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action to compel specific performance of a contract.

1Opinion of the CourtBeekman, J.

On the 3d day of August, 1892, the defendant, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of this State, through its trustees entered into a contract in writing with the plaintiff containing the following provisions:

I. “ Said village, for the considerations hereinafter expressed, assents to discontinuances as public highways of (1) so much of Harrison street in said village as is bounded on both sides by land *196of said company; (2) so much of Webster avenne in said village as lies between the southeasterly line of the Harlem River and Portchester Railroad, as now laid out, and the main…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Corporation of Brick Presbyterian Church v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1826
  2. Reilly v. . City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Gale v. Village of KalamazooMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Britton v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1843
  5. Excelsior Brick Co. v. Village of HaverstrawNew York Court of Appeals · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vandalia Railroad v. State ex rel. City of South BendIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Morris v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Lawton v. City of New RochelleNew York Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API