Legal Opinion

Allied Mutual Insurance v. Musil

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1992No. S-90-395PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

In this declaratory judgment action, the district court sustained the plaintiff-appellee Allied Mutual Insurance Company’s motion for summary judgment upon a finding that the automobile liability insurance policy Allied had issued to the defendant-appellee Glen Musil did not provide liability protection for an accident involving a vehicle his son, the defendant-appellee James Musil, was driving and in which the defendant-appellant, Christie Habe, was riding as a passenger. Habe asserts the district court erred in so finding and ruling. We affirm.

The accident occurred at approximately 1:15…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. SellersNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Andrews v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Alder v. FIRST NAT. BANK AND TRUST CO.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Allstate Ins. Co. v. FARMERS MUT. INS.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Reserve Insurance Company v. AguileraNebraska Supreme Court · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. American Family Insurance Group v. HemenwayNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Allied Mutual Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. HildebrandNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Amco Insurance v. NortonNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Jaramillo v. Mercury InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API