Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wilson v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 30, 2003No. Nos. SC03-1630, SC03-1654Published

1DissentWells, J.

I dissent because this Court does not have jurisdiction to “suspend” a provision of a lawfully enacted statute or to mandate *193that evidence which is described in the statute be maintained beyond the period the statute specifically states that the evidence is to be maintained. The majority does not state the constitutional basis for this extraordinary power.

The emergency petition filed by the Florida Criminal Procedure Rules Committee for an amendment to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure seeks only to amend rule 3.853. The petition does not seek a suspension of the statute, nor does it…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Allen v. ButterworthSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Paramount Enterprises, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. Amendment to Fla. Rules of Cr. Proc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2001
  4. Besoner v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Florida · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API