Legal Opinion · Dissent

Farr v. Nordman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1956No. Docket 90, Calendar 46,544Published

1DissentBlack, J.

This suit, brought here in abortive effort to save that which judging by tax assessments must be a home of the humble, will undoubtedly be known in years to come as the “thirty-six cent tax case.” It arrives in a court of equity grown cold and aloof from the warmth and worth of its maxims — a court that, to engage Mr. Justice Cardozo’s expression, plunges the knife with averted gaze, convinced as it deplores and performs the sacrificial rite that it has no other choice — a court that wrings pious hands as it records upon corporal oath inability “to find a way to grant them (the plaintiff…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Addison v. Holly Hill Fruit Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Grimes v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Hedges v. Dixon CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Graf v. Hope Building Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1930

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API