Legal Opinion

Lambert v. Katz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 2, 1986PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, for an accounting, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hurowitz, J.), dated May 15, 1985, which granted the plaintiffs motion for leave to serve an amended complaint.

Order affirmed, with costs. The appellants’ time to answer the amended complaint is extended until 20 days after service upon them of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry.

Special Term properly exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiff leave to serve an amended complaint to assert additional causes of action. CPLR 3025 (b) provides that "[a]…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Edenwald Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Scarangello v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Daigle v. Texas International Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rothstein v. City UniversityNew York Court of Claims · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API