Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bernard Eric Miller v. William Smith Attorney General of the State of Maryland

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 23, 1997No. 95-7521Published

1DissentMurnaghan, Circuit Judge

Bernard Eric Miller was denied his right to appeal his criminal conviction because he could not afford to obtain, and the State of Maryland refused to provide, a trial transcript which was necessary to perfect his appeal. Since I believe Maryland’s refusal to provide a transcript deprives Miller of the protections guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, I respectfully dissent.

I

Following his conviction for felony murder in Maryland state court, Miller attempted to obtain a transcript of his trial in order to perfect a direct appeal. As an indigent, Miller sought the transcript at state expense.…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API