Legal Opinion
Franklin v. Apfel
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided May 22, 1998No. 1:96-cv-00811PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
CURTIN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Roger R. Franklin (“Franklin”) filed this action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to appeal defendant’s unfavorable final decision denying disability benefits. Plaintiff and defendant, Commissioner Kenneth S. Apfel (the “Commissioner”), have cross-moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(c). For the following reasons, plaintiffs motion is granted, defendant’s motion is denied, and the matter is remanded for further administrative proceedings.
Procedural History
Plaintiff filed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Janine A. WAGNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Ramona PEREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Van Iderstine v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2022