Legal Opinion · Concurrence

McAdory v. Alabama Democratic Party

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1999No. 1980004Published

1ConcurrenceLyons, Justice

The Alabama Democratic Party (“Party”) has offered two reasons why it was authorized to dismiss Lawrence MeAdory’s contest of an election that he lost by two votes: (1) McAdory submitted improperly obtained evidence of invalid absentee ballots, including evidence that convicted felons had cast absentee ballots and (2) McAdory did not timely file a proper statement of election contest. The main opinion addresses the Party’s first reason. However, I see no reason to address that issue, because the Party was authorized to dismiss Lawrence McAdoyy’s election contest because he did not, within the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. AllwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Cousins v. WigodaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Ex Parte GraddickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. The Ripon Society, Inc. v. National Republican Party the Ripon Society, Inc. v. National Republican PartyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  5. Harris v. WeatherfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API