Turner v. Mitch Murch's Maintenance Mgmt. Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Dissent
ROY L. RICHTER, Judge.
I respectfully dissent. Although I am sympathetic to Claimant and his hard*231ships, I disagree with the majority that the record does not support a termination date of June 25, 2010. To the contrary, our standard of review constrains this Court to follow the Commission’s finding that Claimant was in fact terminated on June 25, 2010, when he stopped communicating with his employer. This court is to defer to the Commission’s findings of fact. Div. of Emp’t Sec. v. Taney Cnty. Dist. R-III, 922 S.W.2d 891, 393 (Mo. banc 1996). Moreover, the weight to be given to the evidence…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hurley v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
- Difatta-Wheaton v. Dolphin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2008
- Hessler v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Bunch v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Rodriguez v. Osco DrugMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.