Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Antonio Hollis

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 25, 2016No. 15-5246PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Antonio Jerome Hollis appeals his 168-month sentence, arguing that the district court improperly denied him credit for acceptance of responsibility pursuant to § 3El.l(a) of the Sentencing Guidelines. The district court' denied him credit solely on the basis of his failure to give early enough notice of his intent to plead guilty. The district court relied on timing under subsection (a) based on the waste of government resources. In doing so, the district court effectively conflated the standards for granting credit under subsections (a) and (b) of § 3E1.1. A remand is accordingly…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Menuskin v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. Bobby Webb (01-5682) and Preston Webb (01-5683)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. CossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. KumarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  5. National Air Traffic Controllers Ass'n v. Secretary of the Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Delwin CooperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  2. United States v. Emmanuel Trencell MerrittCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
  3. United States v. Christopher SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. Elmo StarlingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. Jaylen SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API