Wilson v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Justice.
Appellant was tried before the court, found guilty of robbery and sentenced to three years’ imprisonment. He contends that the evidence was insufficient inasmuch as the record fails to establish that he was resisting apprehension when he applied physical force against the arresting officer. Ark. Grim. Code § 41-2103 (1976) reads: “A person commits robbery if with the purpose of committing a theft or resisting apprehension immediately thereafter, he employs or threatens to immediately employ physical force upon another.” Appellant admits there was physical force within the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Patterson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jarrett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Becker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- James A. Becker v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Kauffeld v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
- White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.