Legal Opinion

Ford v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1976No. 36781PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant appeals from the trial court’s denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his motion to vacate judgment and sentence. Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R. He argues that because neither the motion, the files nor the records conclusively showed that he is entitled to no relief, the court should have held a hearing in order to determine whether the proceedings before the juvenile court conformed to prescribed standards. The question for our decision is whether, where no motion to dismiss was filed at trial challenging the waiver hearing conducted by the juvenile court pursuant to § 211.071, RSMo…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Hall v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. McCrary v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. State Ex Rel. T.J.H. v. BillsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  5. Jefferson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wilkins v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. State v. AbbottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. State v. LePageMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Bryant v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. State v. HollisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API