Legal Opinion

Howenstine v. Cotter

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 16, 2005No. 2003-CA-2030Published

1Opinion of the Court

LTERRI F. LOVE, Judge.

This appeal arises from a property dispute. Mr. William van Howenstine (hereinafter “Mr. Howenstine”) and Mr. Michael Cotter (hereinafter “Mr. Cotter”) entered into a “Gentlemen’s Agreement” under which Mr. Cotter, in exchange for the continued usé of the property upon which he conducted his arborist business and stored other wood products, agreed to maintain and perform restoration to the property he occupied. Mr. Howenstine asserts Mr. Cotter was negligent in the fulfillment of the terms of their agreement.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Mr. Oscar Lacinak (hereinafter “Mr.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. Cosse v. Allen-Bradley Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  3. Fox v. Argonaut Southwest Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Pinkins v. CabesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API