Legal Opinion
People v. Fuller
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 17, 1969No. Crim. 14013PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DRUCKER, J. pro tem. *
Defendants were charged by information with five counts of burglary. A public defender was appointed to represent both. Motion pursuant to section 995 of the Penal Code was denied and defendants pleaded “not guilty.”
Motions for separate trials and to suppress evidence were argued and denied.
Defendants and both counsel waived jury trial, and the cause was submitted upon the transcript of the preliminary hearing and the testimony at the trial.
The defendants were found guilty as charged on all counts, and the court found the burglaries to be of the first degree as to counts…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. RomoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Brown v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- People v. BryantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- People v. InmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Ramey v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.