Legal Opinion

Hill v. Cahoon

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 6, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

The questions presented for determination on this appeal are: (1) Did the Superior Court have jurisdiction of the subject matter of this action? (2) Does a widow, upon her remarriage, forfeit her right to receive future compensation under an award of the Commission adjudging her to be the sole dependent and entitled to receive the full compensation awarded by reason of the death of her husband? (3) If a widow, who has been adjudged the sole dependent of her husband pursuant to the provisions of our Workmen’s Compensation Act, dies before all the compensation awarded has been paid, is her…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Adlemen v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
  2. Hansen v. Brann & Stewart Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1917
  3. Inman v. MearesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Britten v. Berger, New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau1940
  5. Green v. BrileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Deese v. Southeastern Lawn and Tree Expert Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Deese v. Southeastern Lawn and Tree Expert Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API