De Moville v. Merchants & Farmers Bank
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion
On Rehearing,
FOSTER, Justice.
Appellant urges us to make response to his contention that he has a right under section 10428, Code, to follow the notes and mortgages into the possession of Banks and Company, as trustees in invitum, and hold them responsible for whatever sums have been realized by them out of such assets.
This Court on former appeal agreed with the decision of the lower court in holding that in making such sale to Banks and Company there was no fraud or conspiracy sufficient to vacate the sale to them on that ground, and affirmed the decree insofar as Banks and Company were…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mahone v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1863
- Harmon v. Dothan Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Hayden v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Pollard v. American Freehold Land Mortgage Co. of LondonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
- Ward v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.