Legal Opinion
Clary Maytag Co. v. Rhyne
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 1, 1930No. 19889PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
A child, by next friend, brought suit alleging that the defendant, through its agent, with the consent of the child’s parents, temporarily installed an electric clothes-washing and wringing machine in the kitchen of his parents’ home for demonstration purposes in order to induce a sale of the machine; that while the defendant’s agent was present and demonstrating the machine for and in the presence of the plaintiff’s mother, the plaintiff, a child of tender years, being attracted by the hum of the machine, its motion and attractive appearance, and being unaware of the danger, placed his hand…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. BeaversSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Linder v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Haley Motor Co. v. BoyntonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Thomas v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Simmons v. Atlanta & West Point RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Smith v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Smith v. KleinbergCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Ragan v. GoddardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.