Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Burton

California Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1892No. 14954Published

Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County allowing an attorney’s fee in a probate proceeding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

This is an appeal from an order of the superior court of San Diego County allowing an attorney’s fee to J. S. Callen, attorney for the absent heirs of said estate. Eespondents move to dismiss the appeal upon the clerk’s certificate that no transcript has been certified, and no bill of exceptions or statement of the case has been settled. Notice of appeal was filed and served March 2, 1891, and an undertaking on appeal in due form was also filed on said day.

Under rule 2 of this court, the appellant has forty days after the appeal is perfected, and the bill of exceptions and statement…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McGrath v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API