Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 3, 1914No. 3151PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARPER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of rape on a girl under fifteen years of age, and prosecutes an appeal to this court.

Appellant moved to continue this case on account of the absence of three witnesses. Two of them, however, were in attendance on court during the trial, and one of them testified, appellant deciding not to use the other one. The attendance of the third witness, Mrs. Lizzie King, was not secured; however, her testimony would be but cumulative of that of a number of witnesses who testified on the trial, and this not being the first trial of the case, it would not be ground…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Oliver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Morton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McIntosh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. Ex Parte HolmesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Bocknight v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API