Legal Opinion

Hubbard-Hall, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided March 29, 2015No. 3:13-cv-104(RNC)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING AND ORDER

ROBERT N. CHATIGNY, District Judge.

This case arises from contamination of industrial property caused by polychlorinated biphenyls (“PCBs”), a highly toxic substance. Plaintiff Hubbard-Hall, a chemical distributor, alleges that PCB-containing paint applied to the exterior of a structure on its property, the Tank Farm Building, has migrated into building materials and surrounding soil. “Old Monsanto,” a predecessor of the named defendants, was the sole manufacturer of PCBs *483in the United States before their manufacture was banned by the EPA in 1977. The Environmental Protection…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  4. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bernier v. Travelers Property Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
  2. Florida Rock Properties, Inc. v. Hess CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
  3. Langara v. Bayer CorporationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
  4. Mancinone v. Allstate Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
  5. Melnick v. Tamko Building Products, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API