Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 1, 1976PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In the case before us we are asked to decide whether the rule regarding the proof necessary to set aside a deed, based on plaintiffs' claims that the deed was forged and that they are the lawful heirs of the original owner, was complied with sufficiently so as to uphold the trial court's order dismissing plaintiffs' petition for sale for division. We find that the trial court correctly complied with the rule and therefore affirm.

Plaintiffs, Frankie Lee Thompson and Arthur Thompson, claim to be the lawful heirs of Jim Thompson, their paternal grandfather, whose estate consists of 156 acres of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Freeman v. BlountSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. San-Ann Service Inc. v. BedingfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  3. Jordan v. Conservation & Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  4. Chapman v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jacoby v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. Congress v. U.S. Bank, N.A.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  3. Briggs v. GlassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  4. Nero v. Moore-Handley, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  5. Smith v. WalkerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API