Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Miller

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action by Thomas J. Reynolds against Ransom H. Miller on a . promissory note. A verdict was directed in favor of defendant at the Monroe circuit, and plaintiff’s motion for a new trial on the exceptions was ordered to be heard at general term in the first instance.

1Opinion of the CourtHaight, J.

This action was brought to recover the amount of a promissory note executed by the defendant, and delivered to the plaintiff. The answer admits the execution and delivery of the note, but alleges, as a defense, nonperformance of the contract under which it was given, failure of consideration, and fraud. It appears that the Trotter Refrigerator Company was a corporation engaged in the manufacture of refrigerators and other articles of merchandise; that on the 14th day of January, 1891, an agreement was entered into between Calvin P. H. Vary, Stephen Keiner, Charles W. Trotter, and the Trotter…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dillon v. . CockcroftNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Kirtz v. . PeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Parker v. ParmeleNew York Supreme Court · 1822
  4. Dunham v. . MannNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  5. Porter v. RoseNew York Supreme Court · 1815

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hull v. CronkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  2. Scobell v. BlockNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Winter v. Williamsburgh Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API