Legal Opinion

La Forge v. Cornell

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 8, 1911PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fifth District. Action by Sarah C. La Forge against Daniel T. Cornell. From a judgment of the Municipal Court for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCavegan, J.

The summons contained the indorsement;

“Complaint, action to recover damages for fraud.”

The pleadings were oral. The defense was a general denial and a counterclaim for $60, but the counterclaim was withdrawn at the end of the proof. The plaintiff was the owner of two lots in the borough of Richmond, New York City; the defendant a real estate broker and auctioneer. On September 3, 1908, plaintiff called at defendant’s office, and asked him what prices lots were bringing in the vicinity of *455her lots. Defendant informed her that lots were selling at that time for between $80 and $150; that he was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roberts v. . ElyNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Warren v. BurtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
  3. Fisher v. . BishopNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Knapp v. . SimonNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  5. Sheehan v. ErbeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Herring-Curtiss Co. v. CurtissNew York Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API