Legal Opinion

United States v. Boedigheimer

District Court, D. Maine

Decided March 7, 2018No. Criminal No. 13–296 ADM/FLN; Civil No. 17–4768 ADMPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ANN D. MONTGOMERY, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the undersigned United States District Judge for a ruling on Defendant Robert David Boedigheimer's ("Boedigheimer") Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 [Criminal Docket No. 130] (the "2255 Motion").1 Also before the Court is Boedigheimer's Motion to Amend the Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 [Docket No. 137]. For the reasons set forth below, Boedigheimer's motions are denied.

II. BACKGROUND2

On June 17, 2014, following an 11 day trial, a jury returned a verdict finding Boedigheimer guilty on two counts of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Yarborough v. GentrySupreme Court of the United States · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barnes v. USA (TV2)District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API