Legal Opinion

Padula v. Royal Plating & Polishing Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 27, 1951PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

14 N.J. Super. 603 (1951)

82 A.2d 225

MICHAEL PADULA, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

v.

ROYAL PLATING & POLISHING CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLEE.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Essex County Court Law Division.

Decided June 27, 1951.

Mr. Herman M. Wilson, for the petitioner-appellant.

Messrs. Toner, Speakman & Crowley (Mr. Robert A. Vanderbilt, appearing), attorneys for the respondent-appellee.

CONLON, J.C.C.

The petitioner was denied compensation and appeals. The material facts are not essentially in dispute, the issue being whether or not the petitioner sustained his injury out of and in the course of his employment.

T…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Hackensack Water Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  2. Saintsing v. Steinbach CompanyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  3. Stevens v. Essex Fells Country ClubSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
  4. Popovich v. Atlantic Products Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1941

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lozano v. Frank DeLuca ConstructionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  2. Complitano v. Steel & Alloy Tank Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  3. Cotton v. Worthington Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  4. Tocci v. Tessler & Weiss, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API