Brown v. Memphis & C. R.
United States Circuit Court
Motion for New Trial. cited Etting v. Bank, 11 Wheat. 75; Hallaway v. Armstrong, 30 Miss. 504; Adams v. Power, 48 Miss. 451; Dorsey v. Spirey, 57 Miss. 527; Clymer v. Cameron, 55 Miss. 593; Perry v. Clark, 5 Miss. (How.) 495; Brantley v. Carter, 26 Miss.; Cameron v. Watson, 40 Miss. 191; Corbin v. Cameron, 31 Miss. 570; Hanna v. Renfro, 32 Miss. 125; M. & C. R. Co. v. Whitfield, 44 Miss. 266; Simpson v. Bonden, 23 Miss. 524; Pritchard v. Meyers, 13 Miss.
Read the full summary
Motion for New Trial. cited Etting v. Bank, 11 Wheat. 75; Hallaway v. Armstrong, 30 Miss. 504; Adams v. Power, 48 Miss. 451; Dorsey v. Spirey, 57 Miss. 527; Clymer v. Cameron, 55 Miss. 593; Perry v. Clark, 5 Miss. (How.) 495; Brantley v. Carter, 26 Miss.; Cameron v. Watson, 40 Miss. 191; Corbin v. Cameron, 31 Miss. 570; Hanna v. Renfro, 32 Miss. 125; M. & C. R. Co. v. Whitfield, 44 Miss. 266; Simpson v. Bonden, 23 Miss. 524; Pritchard v. Meyers, 13 Miss. (S. & M.) 532; Barkins v. Winston, 24 Miss. 431; Docier v. Ellis, 28 Miss. 720; Bank v. Railroad Co. 53 Miss. 200; Abbrighton v. Railroad…
1Opinion of the Court
Hammond, D. J.
This case is again before me on a motion
for a new trial, and I have been aided by lengthy oral arguments, and an elaborate printed brief for defendant of unusual earnestness and exhaustive research. It is conceded by the learned counsel for defendant that “in all cases of exclusion for any reason we have not found a single case of a woman, but that on account of color, in Railroad Co. v. Williams, 55 Ill. 185, and Railroad Co. v. Miles, 55 Pa. St. 209,” to which may be added Railroad Co. v. Brown, 17 Wall. 445, and other cases not necessary to cite. This statement accords with…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Day v. WoodworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Philadelphia, Wilmington, & Baltimore Railroad v. QuigleySupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Railroad Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Bass v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Anne P. Kozar, Administratrix of the Estate of John P. Kozar, Deceased v. The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
- Kozar v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1970
- Erie R. v. LittellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
- Huff v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Breen v. St. Louis Transit Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.