Legal Opinion

Neal v. Goord

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 4, 2001No. Docket No. 99-0253PublishedCited by 113 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge:

There are two questions on this appeal where the issue before us is the propriety of the dismissal of plaintiffs amended complaint. The first question asks whether a prisoner’s claim of an alleged deprivation of medical services must be administratively exhausted before relief may be sought in federal court. The answer to that question hinges on whether the action of which the inmate complains is properly classified as a single, momentary matter — for example, an individualized retaliatory action against him or a particularized instance of excessive force — in which…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Eduardo M. Perez v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections and Michael J. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  5. Douglas Nyhuis v. Janet Reno, Attorney General Eric Holder, Deputy Attorney General Kathleen Hawk, Director-Bop John Hahn, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by113 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. DodrillDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Green v. RubensteinDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2009
  3. Neal v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  4. Kitchen v. IckesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
  5. Joanna Cieszkowska v. Gray Line New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API