Legal Opinion

Abbott v. Smith

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 5, 1887PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBingham, J.

The sum due the defendant for his labor at the date of the service of the writ was less than twenty dollars. It does not appear that the claim on which the suit is founded is for necessaries. The trustees are not chargeable, regardless of the question of the validity of the assignment. G . L., c. 249, s. 40.

Osgood & Prescott, for the plaintiff. J. H. Andrews, for the claimants.

Exceptions overruled.

Doe, C. J., was absent; Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Bank of Wheatland v. Bagley Bros.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Massachusetts Mut. L. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  3. Jones v. KepfordWyoming Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Neely v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  5. Jamaica Savings Bank v. Howard'sSupreme Court of Vermont · 1906