Van Wyck v. . McIntosh

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The fact having been disclosed by the plaintiffs' evidence that the note in question was in blank, and was filled up with the amount by one of the makers when it was delivered, it was competent for the plaintiffs to show that the defendant had, before that time, delivered notes to the same maker, indorsed in blank in like manner, to be used in the business of the firm to which such maker belonged. This evidence was not competent on the question of handwriting,…