Legal Opinion

Leighton v. Knapp

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1904PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action by William T. Leighton against Homer Knapp. Demurrer to the complaint sustained.

1Opinion of the CourtNash, J.

“All corporate acts, which the Legislature has not authorized, remain prohibited by the common law.” Morawetz on Corporations, § 648. The Leighton Lea Association, therefore, had no power or authority to incur indebtedness, except that which was conferred by the act under which it was incorporated. Chapter 122, p. 234, Laws 1851. The only provision of the act which authorized corporations formed under it to create indebtedness is section 5, which reads as follows:

“Sec. 5. All corporations formed under this act shall have power to borrow money for temporary purposes not inconsistent with the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Assets Realization Co. v. HowardNew York Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Assets Realization Co. v. HowardNew York Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Leighton v. Leighton Lea Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  4. Leighton v. Leighton Lea Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Assets Realization Co. v. HowardNew York Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API