Legal Opinion

New Hampshire Fire Insurance Co. v. Curtis

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 22, 1955No. 1 Div. 639Published

1Opinion of the Court

85 So.2d 441 (1955)

NEW HAMPSHIRE FIRE INSURANCE CO.

v.

B. H. CURTIS, Jr.

1 Div. 639.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

December 22, 1955.

Rehearing Denied February 2, 1956.

Alex T. Howard, Mobile, for appellant.

Caffey, Gallalee & Caffey, Mobile, for appellee.

2Per curiam 1

This is a suit by the insured, appellee, against the insurer, appellant, on a policy of insurance covering a tractor-trailer for damages resulting from a collision or upset. The suit was tried on a plea of the general issue and special plea No. 5.

Plea No. 3 refers to the policy which contains the "automobile endorsement", by which "loss, damage or…

Also in this document: Per curiam 2.

3Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Mobile Auto Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Penticost v. MasseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  3. Peet & Co. v. HatcherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  4. J. R. Watkins Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Fleming v. L. & N. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1906

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API