Legal Opinion

State v. Saldierna

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 21, 2016No. 271PA15PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMUNDS, Justice.

Defendant, a juvenile, asked to telephone his mother while undergoing custodial questioning by police investigators. The call was allowed, after which the interrogation continued. The trial court denied defendant’s motion to suppress the statements he made following the call. We conclude that defendant’s request to call his mother was not a clear invocation of his right to consult a parent or guardian before proceeding with the questioning. Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals that reversed the trial court’s order denying the motion to suppress.

After…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. J. D. B. v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. State v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SaldiernaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  2. State v. AugustinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  3. State v. SaldiernaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  4. State v. SaldiernaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  5. State v. WilkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API