Legal Opinion

Barrett v. City of Newburgh

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 21, 2017No. 17-1185-cvUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

17-1185-cv Barrett v. City of Newburgh UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  5. Hogan v. FischerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API