Legal Opinion
Ring v. Moore Cty.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided December 19, 2017No. COA16-1034PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
INMAN, Judge.
*168 A county ordinance rezoning a tract of land is not subject to challenge in court by owners of an adjacent tract who fail to allege actual or imminent injury resulting from the rezoning.
Glen Lewis Ring, Wanda Joyce Ring, William Thomas Ring, and Pamela Ann Ring (collectively "Plaintiffs") appeal from an order dismissing their declaratory judgment action against Moore County, Camp *169 Easter *12 Management LLC ("Camp Easter"), and Bob Koontz (collectively "Defendants"), challenging the rezoning of a tract of land in Moore County, North Carolina (the "Property"). Plaintiffs argue that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Neuse River Foundation, Inc. v. Smithfield Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Mangum v. Raleigh Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
- Taylor v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Metcalf v. Black Dog Realty, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Byron v. Synco Props., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- Mar. Advisors, LLC v. HC Composites, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025
- Thomas v. Vill. of Bald Head IslandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2023
- Thomas v. Vill. of Bald Head IslandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2023