Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Olson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 2009No. PR 07-0131PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

¶1 On February 15, 2007, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) filed a formal complaint against Eric Olson (Olson) alleging violations of Rule 3.4 and Rules 8.4(b)-(d) of the Montana Rules of Professional Conduct (MRPC). These rules read in relevant part as follows:

Rule 3.4-Fairness to Opposing Party and Counsel

A lawyer shall not:(a) unlawfully obstruct another party’s access to evidence, unlawfully alter, destroy or conceal a document or other material *359having potential evidentiary value, or counsel or assist another person to do any such act....

Rule 8.4-Misconduct

It is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. In Re PottsMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Matter of MattMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. JaramilloSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  5. In the Matter of EngelMontana Supreme Court · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CinelliMassachusetts Superior Court · 2014
  2. In Re OlsonMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Nilhan Developers, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API