Legal Opinion

People v. Kennedy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 19, 2010PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*882Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the grand jury proceeding did not fail to conform to the requirements of CPL article 190 to such a degree that the integrity thereof was impaired, and, even if some of the testimony elicited was inadmissible, no prejudice to the defendant could have resulted therefrom (see CPL 210.20 [1] [c]; 210.35 [5]; People v Huston, 88 NY2d 400, 409 [1996]).

The trial court did not err in allowing the People to submit evidence of cocaine residue in the defendant’s pants pocket. Contrary to the defendant’s assertion, this evidence was not evidence of a separate…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Webb v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. People v. HalmNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. People v. HustonNew York Court of Appeals · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. ReadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. People v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. Catano-Lezcano (Fernando)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2021
  4. People v. HubsherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
  5. People v. KennedyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API