Legal Opinion

Charles W. and T.W. v. United Behavioral Health and the Wells Fargo & Company Health Plan

District Court, D. Utah

Decided November 24, 2025No. 2:18-cv-00829Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION CHARLES W. and T.W., Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE ANSWER NUNC PRO TUNC UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH and the WELLS FARGO & COMPANY HEALTH Case No. 2:18-cv-000829-TC PLAN, Judge Tena Campbell Defendants. Before the court is the Defendants’ Cross-Motion for Leave to File Answer Nunc Pro Tunc. (ECF No. 68.) The Defendants included this request in their response to the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Answer. (ECF No. 61.) For the following reasons, the court finds…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Juan v. Acevedo FelicianoSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  2. Shaw v. Nebraska, Department of Correctional ServicesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API