Legal Opinion

State v. Hart

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 26, 1988No. 09-87-188 CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIES, Chief Justice.

In November, 1985, the State of Texas sued Andrew Paul Hart, d/b/a Hart Creosoting Company, alleging, inter alia, that “Hart processes its wood preserving waste water [creosote] by retaining it in four surface impoundments”; that “[t]hese ponds have accumulated sludges containing creosote which are listed by the EPA as hazardous. These ponds have overflowed frequently in the past, resulting in discharge into a tributary of Walnut Run Creek.” The State alleged that Hart had violated the Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act, TEX.REV. CIV.STATANN art. 4477-7 (Vernon 1976 and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ButlerTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. State v. City of Greenville, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
  4. Cantu Trucking & Materials Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Holubec v. Brandenburger, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
  2. David Holubec and Mary Holubec v. Carl Brandenburger, Individually, and as Next Friend of Payton Brandenburger and Carson Brandenburger, Kathy Brandenburger, William R. Lee, Laverne Lee, and R&J Livestock Company and Batesville Farming Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
  3. Patricia E. Nations v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
  4. Patricia E. Nations v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API