Legal Opinion
Babyage.Com, Inc. v. Toys "R" US, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 18, 2006No. Civil Action 05-6792, 06-242PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EXPLANATION AND ORDER
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
In this antitrust action, defendants Toys “R” Us — Delaware, Inc., et al. (“defendants”) have moved to compel the production of recordings and transcripts of conversations recorded by plaintiffs Ba-byage.com, Inc. and The Baby Club of America, Inc. (“retailer plaintiffs”). 1 Each conversation took place between a representative of one of the retailer plaintiffs and a representative of one of the defendants. 2 The retailer plaintiffs allegedly recorded these conversations unbeknownst to defendants. 3 For the reasons set forth below, I will…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Snead v. American Export-Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Costa v. AFGO Mechanical Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gardner v. Norfolk Southern Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Joan Mernick and John Mernick v. Wanda McCutchen and HudsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
- Herrick v. WilsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011