Legal Opinion

Hammans v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 9, 1941No. 164PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.

The question before us is whether, in computing income taxes upon gain realized through the exchange by the petitioner of certain shares of preferred stock of Bulova Watch Co. for cash and common stock, the tax should be laid under § 115(c) of the Revenue Act of 1936, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Acts, page 868, upon 100% of the gain because the distribution was a partial liquidating dividend, or under § 117(a), 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Acts, page 873, upon only 30% of the gain because the distribution was not a partial liquidating dividend.

For more than ten years prior to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McClain v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alpers v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  2. Bedford's Estate v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  3. Yankey v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  4. Mittelman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1945
  5. Alpers v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API