Mola Development Corp. v. Orange County Assessment Appeals Board No. 2
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SILLS, P. J.
I. Introduction
The question before us is whether the assessment appeals board erred in its methodology in valuing certain contaminated commercial real property in Irvine in the early 1990’s. The board took what it determined to be the fair market value of the property if unpolluted, then deducted the cost of cleanup, but next added back in expected contributions toward the cleanup from two former owners. The taxpayer then successfully petitioned the trial court for an order mandating the board to subtract the amount that it had added back in, and the board has now appealed…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Tanglewood East Homeowners Jimmie D. Lee, Jr. v. Charles-Thomas, Inc., First Federal Savings & Loan Association of ConroeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Commerce Holding Corp. v. Board of AssessorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Roehm v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Continental Development Corp.California Supreme Court · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- San Franciscans Upholding the Downtown Plan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Northeast Ct. Economic Alliance, Inc. v. ATC PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Barrett v. Town of WarrenSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Ehp Glendale, LLC v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.