Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fairbank v. Douglas

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 27, 1933No. 4-3190Published

1DissentSmith, J.

The net result of the majority opinion is that for a consideration of $58.66 the wife of the attorney for the improvement district has acquired property which the undisputed testimony shows has — even now — -notwithstanding the depression, a market value, of not less than $6,000' cash. No witness placed the cash market value at a smaller figure, and some placed it much higher. The Bankers’ Mortgage Company made a cash loan of $5,000, and the appellants, who are the trustees of the Missouri Congregational Conference, thought the property safe security for a loan of that amount, and upon that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co. v. Drainage District No. 17Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  2. Arkansas-Louisiana Highway Improvement District v. PickensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  3. Cabell v. Board of Improvement of Improvement District No. 10Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API