Legal Opinion

Herrera v. Gosnell

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 26, 1974No. 73-540PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant appeals a trial court order requiring him to pay back 100% of the benefits he’d received from Reserve Insurance Company. The order was based upon the trial court’s interpretation of F.S. 627.736 (1971). We reverse and remand upon the authority of Catches v. Gov’t. Employees Ins. Co., 295 So.2d 116 (1st D.C.A.Fla.1974); Reyes v. Banks, 292 So.2d 39 (4th D.C.A.Fla.1974); Schwartz v. Hughey, 292 So.2d 43 (4th D.C.A.Fla.1974), and White v. Reserve Ins. Co., 299 So.2d 661 (1st D.C.A.Fla.1974). There should be an equitable distribution of the insurance funds in accordance with F.S.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reyes v. BanksDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  2. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. v. HauserDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  3. White v. Reserve Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. ManceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  5. Catches v. Govt. Employees Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Reserve Insurance v. HargroveDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API