Legal Opinion
Albert E. Robinson v. Stanley Home Products, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided December 10, 1959No. 5573PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, Circuit Judge.
This action was brought by plaintiff-appellant, a citizen of Massachusetts, in the district court for the District of Massachusetts under section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 15, to recover treble damages for injuries alleged to have been suffered because of a violation of section 2(c) of the Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 13(c). The defendants were one Gahm, of New Jersey, doing business as Plura Plastics, hereinafter called Plura, as to whom a dismissal was entered for lack of service, and appellee, Stanley Home Products,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Federal Trade Commission v. Simplicity Pattern Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Anna C. Dunn v. Ray GazzolaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1954
- Massachusetts Universalist Convention v. Hildreth & Rogers Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1950
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- William L. O'Brien v. Robert J. DigraziaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Federal Trade Commission v. BrochSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Larry R. George Sales Company v. Cool Attic Corporation and Butler Ventamatic Corporation, Martin D. SiegelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Ronald ShepardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Schneider v. Colegio De Abogados De Puerto RicoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1982
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.