Legal Opinion

Kilbane v. Secretary of Human Services

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 3, 1982PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

Acting under G. L. c. 266, § 91, as amended through St. 1963, c. 222, which deals with false advertising, the plaintiff sought to enjoin the defendants from publishing and distributing certain informational material. A Superior Court judge allowed a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted (Mass.R.Civ.P. 12[b][6], 365 Mass. 755 [1974]) and judgment entered accordingly. We affirm.

The basis for dismissing the complaint was that the Commonwealth may not be made to answer to actions under G. L. *287c. 266, § 91. That statute, inserted by St. 1916,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. David R. Ruiz, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee v. W. J. Estelle, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. David R. Ruiz, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee v. W. J. Estelle, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. Ruiz v. EstelleDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1980
  5. Woodbridge v. Worcester State HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ELM Medical Laboratories, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  2. Bretton v. State Lottery CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. DowdMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. VoightMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
  5. Massachusetts Correction Officers Federated Union v. County of BristolMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API