Legal Opinion

In Re Interim Procedure for Removal/Appeal of Conciliation Court Proceedings to District Court

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 29, 2003No. C6-84-2134, CX-89-1863Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

In an opinion filed August 26, 2003, the court of appeals held that the procedure in Minn. R. Civ. P. 4.05 must be used to effect service by mail on the opposing party in order to remove/appeal a case from conciliation court to district court and that compliance with the procedure in Minn. Gen. R. Prac. 521(b) is not effective. Roehrdanz v. Brill, 668 N.W.2d 217 (Minn.App.2003). This court has granted review of that decision. To avoid confusion among the numerous pro se parties who litigate in conciliation court, it is necessary and appropriate to provide interim guidance on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Roehrdanz v. BrillCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API