Legal Opinion

Austin v. Cox

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 1, 1988No. 86-916Published

1Opinion of the Court

523 So.2d 376 (1988)

Phillip Clark AUSTIN

v.

Daryl Dewayne COX.

86-916.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 1, 1988.

Frank R. Farish, Birmingham, for appellant.

Robert E. Cooper of Rives & Peterson, Birmingham, for appellee.

STEAGALL, Justice.

The plaintiff, Phillip Clark Austin, appeals from a denial of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative, motion for new trial following a jury verdict finding that Austin's claim against the defendant, Daryl Dewayne Cox, for injuries received in an automobile accident was barred by accord and satisfaction.

In an earlier proceeding in this…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Jawad v. GranadeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Jehle-Slauson Const. Co. v. Hood-Rich Architects and Consulting EngineersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. McMahan v. McMahonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  5. Birmingham News Co. v. Birmingham Printing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API