Legal Opinion
Julio Cisternas-Estay and Doris Cisternas-Estay v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 14, 1976No. 75--1261Published
1Opinion of the Court
531 F.2d 155
Julio CISTERNAS-ESTAY and Doris Cisternas-Estay, Petitioners,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE.
No. 75--1261.
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
Argued Oct. 29, 1975.
Decided Feb. 25, 1976.
Rehearing En Banc Denied
March 22, 1976.
As Amended May 14, 1976.
James J. Orlow, Wasserman, Orlow, Kaye & Rubin, Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner.
James P. Morris, Bowie, Md., John L. Murphy, Chester J. Halicki, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Gary Tilles, Asst. U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent.
Before GIBBONS, BIGGS and WEIS, Circuit Judges.
OPINION OF THE COURT
BIGGS,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Federal Trade Commission v. Cement InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Foti v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.