Legal Opinion

Advanced Delivery Service, Inc. v. Gates

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 28, 1986No. B012061PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLEIN, P. J.

Plaintiffs and appellants Advanced Delivery Service, Inc., a corporation (ADS) and Nance Outlaw (Outlaw) appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendants and respondents Daryl F. Gates, Chief of Police of the City of Los Angeles (Gates), J. Stroh, Chief of Police of the City of Inglewood (Stroh), and interveners and respondents California Horse Racing Board (Board) and Hollywood Park, Inc. (Hollywood Park).

A scheme whereby a messenger service procures pari-mutuel tickets for clients not present at the race track violates Penal Code section 337a (section 337a),…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Larsen v. JohannesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Conn v. National Can CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Avila v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lonely Maiden Productions v. Goldentree Asset ManagementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Crockford's Club Ltd. v. Si-AhmedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Massingill v. Department of Food & AgricultureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. People v. BannerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Opinion No. (1997), California Attorney General Reports1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API